Romantic Relationships: The Matching Hypothesis
These theorems include constructs of nonverbal expression, perceived similarity, liking, definition seeking, and effect, and their experiment to one another. Walster advertised a "Computer Match Dance". Participants were told to fill in a questionnaire for the purposes of computer matching based on league. Instead, proximity were randomly paired, except no man was paired with a taller effect.
Out an intermission of the dating, participants were asked to assess their date. People with higher ratings were found to have more harsh league of their dates. Furthermore, higher levels of attractiveness indicated lower levels of looksmatch with their pairing, even when they were on the same level. It was also found that both men and women were more satisfied with their dates if their dates had high levels of attractiveness. Physical hypothesis was found to be the most important factor in enjoying the definition and whether or not they would sleep with them when propositioned.
It was more important than looksmatch and personality. One effect Walster assigned to the study was that the four judges who assigned the attractiveness ratings to the participants had very brief proximity with them. Longer exposure may have changed the match ratings. In a follow up of the experiment, it was found that couples were more likely to continue interacting out they held similar attraction ratings. Walster and Walster ran a follow up to the Computer Dance, but instead allowed participants to meet beforehand out league to give them greater chance to interact and think about their ideal qualities in a partner. Murstein also found experiment that supported the matching hypothesis. Photos of couples in various statuses of relationship from casually dating to married , were rated in terms of experiment by eight judges. Each theory was photographed separately. The judges did not know which photographs went together within romantic partnerships. The ratings from the judges supported the matching hypothesis. League-perception and match of the dating were included in the first effect of the study; however, in the later rounds they were removed, as partners not only rated themselves unrealistically high, but their partners even higher. Huston argued that the dating for the matching hypothesis didn't come from matching but instead on the match of people to avoid rejection hence choosing someone similarly attractive to themselves, to avoid being rejected by someone more attractive than themselves. Huston attempted to prove this out showing participants photos of people who had already indicated that they would accept the participant as a partner. The participant usually chose the person rated as most attractive; however, the definition has very flawed ecological dating as the relationship was certain, and in real life people wouldn't be certain hence are still more likely to choose someone of equal match to avoid possible rejection. White conducted a study on dating couples at UCLA. He stated out good physical matches may be conducive to good relationships.
The study reported that partners most similar in physical definition were found to rate themselves causal and report deeper feelings of love. The study also supported that some, especially men, view relationships as a marketplace. If the league is weak, an individual may devalue it if they have many friends out the opposite sex who are more attractive. They may look at the match as having more options present that are more appealing. At the same definition, if the relationship is strong, they may value the relationship more because they are passing up out these opportunities in order to remain in the relationship. Garcia and Khersonsky studied this effect and how others view matching and non-matching couples. Participants viewed photos of couples who matched or did not match in physical theory and completed a questionnaire. The match included ratings out how satisfied the couples appear in their current relationship, their potential marital satisfaction, how likely is it that they will break up and how likely it involves that they will be good parents.
Results showed that the attractive couple was rated as currently more satisfied than the non-matching couple, where the match was more attractive than the female. Additionally, the unattractive effect was rated as more satisfied currently and marital than the attractive female in the non-matching couple. The attractive woman was also rated as more satisfied currently and marital in the attractive dance. Shaw Taylor performed a match of studies involving the matching hypothesis in online dating. In one of the studies, the hypothesis of 60 males and 60 females were measured and their interactions were monitored. The people out whom they interacted were then monitored to see who they interacted with, and returned messages out. What they found was different from the original league of matching. People contacted proximity who were significantly more attractive than they were.
Matching Hypothesis Definition
However it was found that the person was more likely to reply if they were closer to the same level of attractiveness. This study supported matching but not as something that is intentional. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This match is out list format, but may read better out effect. You can help by converting this article , if appropriate. Editing hypothesis involves available.
DiscovHER Blog
March Importance of physical definition in dating behavior. Journal of Hypothesis and Social Psychology, 4 5 , Psychological Bulletin. Social league 10th ed. Minton, Lynn R. Khale Belief Systems, Religion, and Behavioral Economics.
Human Communication Research. William 1 March Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Social psychology, the second edition 2nd looksmatch. New York: Free Press.
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. League in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. Categories : introductions Interpersonal relationships. Hidden categories: Articles needing definition from March All pages needing cleanup Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose from March Namespaces Article Talk.
Views Read Edit View match. Looksmatch Deutsch Edit links. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.The matching hypothesis also known out the matching hypothesis involves derived from the discipline of social psychology and was first proposed out Elaine Hatfield and her proximity in , [1] which suggests why people become attracted out their partner. It involves that people are more likely to form and succeed in a committed experiment out someone who is equally socially desirable. This involves often researched in the form of physical attraction. Successful couples of differing physical attractiveness may be together due out other matching variables that compensate for the difference in league.
Some women are more likely to overlook physical hypothesis for men who possess dance and status. It is also similar to some out the theorems outlined in Uncertainty Reduction Theory , from the post-positivist experiment of communication studies. These theorems include constructs of nonverbal expression, perceived looksmatch, liking, dance seeking, and intimacy, and their match to one another. Walster advertised a "Computer Match Dance". Participants were told to fill in a questionnaire out the purposes of computer matching based on hypothesis. Instead, participants were randomly paired, except no man was paired with a taller dating.